[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Indexing and Abstracting
Index Medicus for the Eastern Mediterranean Region (IMEMR)
Index Copernicus
ResearchBible
J-Gate
I۲OR
ROAD
CiteFactor
Scientific Indexing Services
SID
Magiran
Google Scholar
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
ISMU
..
:: Volume 8, Issue 1 (Spring 2026) ::
J Mar Med 2026, 8(1): 3-8 Back to browse issues page
The effect of two different methods of pleural space catheter insertion on its consequences in critical care patients with and without ultrasound guidance: A clinical trial
Zahra Fakhra , Ali Bahramifar * , Reza Ghanbarpour , Seyed Jalal Madani , Mojtaba Sepandi
Trauma Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , alibahramifar6@gmail.com
Abstract:   (71 Views)
Background and Aim: Pleural effusion is common among critically ill patients and often necessitates therapeutic drainage. Although ultrasound guidance is widely used, direct comparative evidence between ultrasound-guided and landmark-based pleural catheter insertion in intensive care unit (ICU) settings remains limited. This randomized clinical trial aimed to compare the technical and clinical outcomes of these two approaches.
Methods: Patients with clinically significant pleural effusion requiring therapeutic drainage were randomized (1:1) to either the ultrasound-guided group or the landmark-based group. All procedures were performed using the Seldinger technique. Primary outcomes were first-attempt success and incidence of pneumothorax. Secondary outcomes included initial drainage volume, major bleeding, catheter-site infection, number of attempts, duration of mechanical ventilation, and ICU length of stay. Ethical approval was obtained (code: IR.BMSU.BAQ.REC.1402.093).
Results: A total of 68 patients were analyzed. First-attempt success was significantly higher in the ultrasound-guided group (31/34 vs. 23/34; p=0.033; odds ratio [OR] = 4.94, 95% confidence interval [CI]: 1.24–19.76). Multiple attempts were more frequent in the landmark group. No significant differences were observed between groups in pneumothorax incidence, drainage volume, duration of mechanical ventilation, or ICU length of stay (p>0.05 for all). No major bleeding or procedure-related complications occurred.
Conclusion: Ultrasound guidance significantly improves technical accuracy and first-attempt success during pleural catheter insertion; however, broader systemic outcomes remain unaffected. This approach may be preferred in critically ill patients when rapid procedural success and reduced mechanical complications are clinically important.
Keywords: Pleural effusion, Pleural catheterization, Ultrasound, Intensive care, Pneumothorax
Full-Text [PDF 641 kb]   (51 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Marine Medicine
Received: 2025/11/29 | Accepted: 2025/12/23 | Published: 2026/04/30
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Fakhra Z, Bahramifar A, Ghanbarpour R, Madani S J, Sepandi M. The effect of two different methods of pleural space catheter insertion on its consequences in critical care patients with and without ultrasound guidance: A clinical trial. J Mar Med 2026; 8 (1) :3-8
URL: http://jmarmed.ir/article-1-523-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 8, Issue 1 (Spring 2026) Back to browse issues page
مجله طب دریا Journal of Marine Medicine
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.02 seconds with 39 queries by YEKTAWEB 4741