[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Indexing and Abstracting
Index Medicus for the Eastern Mediterranean Region (IMEMR)
Index Copernicus
ResearchBible
J-Gate
I۲OR
ROAD
CiteFactor
Scientific Indexing Services
SID
Magiran
Google Scholar
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
ISMU
..
:: Volume 7, Issue 3 (Autumn 2025) ::
J Mar Med 2025, 7(3): 201-209 Back to browse issues page
Investigating the Interaction Effect of Feedback Type (Self-Controlled vs. Paired) and Presentation Mode (Whole vs. Difficult Part) on the Acquisition, Retention, and Transfer of the Breaststroke Leg Kick Skill
Bahman Hassanvand * , Milad Delfan
Department of Physical Education and Sport Sciences, Khor.C., Islamic Azad University, Khorramabad Branch, Iran, Khorramabad , hasanvand121@gmail.com
Abstract:   (26 Views)
Background and Aim: The primary objective of this study was to investigate the interaction effect of two feedback types (self-controlled and paired) and two presentation modes (whole and difficult part) on the acquisition, retention, and transfer of the breaststroke leg kick skill in adolescents. Given the importance of feedback in motor learning, this research aimed to clarify the role of self-controlled feedback, particularly under challenging practice conditions. A secondary objective was to examine whether need-based, learner-tailored feedback delivery could lead to improved performance and skill consolidation across different learning phases.
Methods: This study employed a quasi-experimental design. The sample consisted of 40 male students aged 15 to 18 years from Khorramabad, Iran, with no prior experience in basic swimming skills. After initial matching, participants were randomly assigned to one of four groups (n=10 each): 1) Whole self-controlled feedback, 2) Difficult-part self-controlled feedback, 3) Whole paired feedback, and 4) Difficult-part paired feedback. The intervention involved delivering the two feedback types (self-controlled or paired) via two presentation modes (focusing on the whole skill or the difficult part of the movement). Data were analyzed using one-way ANOVA, repeated-measures ANOVA, and Tukey's post-hoc test.
Results: The results indicated that the interaction effect between feedback type (self-controlled vs. paired) and presentation mode (whole vs. difficult part) on the variables of skill acquisition, immediate retention, delayed retention, and transfer was not statistically significant.
Conclusion: Based on the findings of this study, the interaction between feedback type (self-controlled and paired) and its presentation mode (whole and difficult part) does not have a significant impact on the processes of acquisition, retention, and transfer of this motor skill in the studied population.
 
Keywords: Self-controlled feedback, Performance awareness, Skill acquisition, Retention, Motor learning
Full-Text [PDF 455 kb]   (33 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Marine Medicine
Received: 2025/08/1 | Accepted: 2025/09/9 | Published: 2025/12/1
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Hassanvand B, Delfan M. Investigating the Interaction Effect of Feedback Type (Self-Controlled vs. Paired) and Presentation Mode (Whole vs. Difficult Part) on the Acquisition, Retention, and Transfer of the Breaststroke Leg Kick Skill. J Mar Med 2025; 7 (3) :201-209
URL: http://jmarmed.ir/article-1-501-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 7, Issue 3 (Autumn 2025) Back to browse issues page
مجله طب دریا Journal of Marine Medicine
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.04 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4732