[Home ] [Archive]   [ فارسی ]  
Main Menu
Home::
Journal Information::
Articles archive::
For Authors::
For Reviewers::
Registration::
Contact us::
Site Facilities::
::
Indexing and Abstracting
Index Medicus for the Eastern Mediterranean Region (IMEMR)
Index Copernicus
ResearchBible
J-Gate
I۲OR
ROAD
CiteFactor
Scientific Indexing Services
SID
Magiran
Google Scholar
..
Search in website

Advanced Search
..
Receive site information
Enter your Email in the following box to receive the site news and information.
..
:: Volume 5, Issue 4 (Winter 2024) ::
J Mar Med 2024, 5(4): 206-213 Back to browse issues page
Assessment of Preparedness Levels in Selected Navy Hospitals for Natural Disasters and Accidents
Mohammad Nobakht , Ali Nasiri , Mohammad Belal , Mohsen Abbasi farajzade *
Faculty of Health, Student Research Committee, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran AND Health Management Research Center, Baqiyatallah University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran , mohsen10_fam@yahoo.com
Abstract:   (240 Views)
Background and Aim: Acknowledging that preventing accidents and natural disasters is not always feasible, the presence of a well-prepared hospital can significantly mitigate fatalities and injuries resulting from such events. This study aimed to evaluate the readiness of naval hospitals in responding to accidents and natural disasters.
Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional study was conducted in 2019-1400 at three selected Navy hospitals using Heydaranlou et al.'s (2015) functional preparedness tool for handling natural disasters and accidents.
Results: Hospital A scored 465, Hospital B scored 442, and Hospital C scored 378, placing them in the average range (60%-41%). The study assessed 17 dimensions across the hospitals. Hospital A excelled in risk assessment and rapid warning systems with a perfect score (100%), while Hospital B lagged in security preparedness with a score of 13.91%. Hospital C demonstrated weak recovery capabilities post-disaster with a score of 27/27, falling within the weak category (40%-21%). Hospital A scored exceptionally well in risk assessment (100%) but poorly in security preparedness (2.27%).
Conclusion: The evaluation of the three naval hospitals indicates they are moderately prepared compared to civilian hospitals. The findings suggest a focus on hospital accreditation standards. Collaboration among these hospitals could enhance preparedness, reduce costs, and improve future evaluations to achieve higher scores.
Keywords: Preparedness, Military Hospital, Accidents, Disasters, Natural Disasters
Full-Text [PDF 440 kb]   (141 Downloads)    
Type of Study: Original Article | Subject: Marine Medicine
Received: 2024/01/19 | Accepted: 2024/01/28 | Published: 2024/02/29
Send email to the article author

Add your comments about this article
Your username or Email:

CAPTCHA



XML   Persian Abstract   Print


Download citation:
BibTeX | RIS | EndNote | Medlars | ProCite | Reference Manager | RefWorks
Send citation to:

Nobakht M, Nasiri A, Belal M, abbasi farajzade M. Assessment of Preparedness Levels in Selected Navy Hospitals for Natural Disasters and Accidents. J Mar Med 2024; 5 (4) :206-213
URL: http://jmarmed.ir/article-1-466-en.html


Rights and permissions
Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License.
Volume 5, Issue 4 (Winter 2024) Back to browse issues page
مجله طب دریا Journal of Marine Medicine
Persian site map - English site map - Created in 0.05 seconds with 37 queries by YEKTAWEB 4645